Spatial and Statistical Patterns of Aircraft Noise Complaints
Keywords:
Aircraft noise, Spatial analysis, Noise complaints;, Urban planning, CGH AirportAbstract
This study proposes and applies an integrated geospatial and statistical approach to investigate the spatial distribution of aircraft noise complaints (2021–2023) near Congonhas Airport (CGH). The methodology comprised four stages: (1) developing a multivariate theoretical framework; (2) collecting and integrating operational and territorial data; (3) spatial modeling using Geographic Information System (GIS) tools; and (4) multiscale statistical analysis incorporating Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression and spatial autocorrelation (Moran’s I = 0.565). Results reveal that 70% of complaints fall outside the noise contours established by the airport’s Specific Noise Zoning Plan, highlighting significant regulatory limitations. Additionally, 87% of complaints originated from residential areas directly under landing and takeoff trajectories. Statistical modeling identified the most influential variables as the presence within 65- and 70-dB zones, inclusion in landing routes, total built-up area, maximum building height, and distance to the runway. The study offers a replicable conceptual and methodological framework for urban airports, with applications in airport noise management, public policy development, acoustic zoning revision, and environmentally sensitive urban planning. This approach is particularly relevant for airport managers, regulatory agencies, and professionals in geotechnologies and urban sustainability.
References
[ANAC] Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil (2011) Nota Técnica nº 02/2011/GTCongonhas/ANAC. Published on 2011, 31st May. In Portuguese. [accessed Aug 16 2025]. https://www.anac.gov.br/assuntos/paginas-tematicas/meio-ambiente/arquivos/NotaTcnica2GTCongonhas.pdf
[DECEA] Departamento de Controle do Espaço Aéreo (2024) AERODROME CHART (ADC). São Paulo/Congonhas - Deputado Freitas Nobre (SBSP). AIRAC AMDT 2404A1, Published on 2024, 18th April. [accessed Aug 16 2025]. https://aisweb.decea.mil.br/download/?arquivo=be004ddd-e780-4e12-a895c692155b2f2c
[DECEA] Departamento de Controle do Espaço Aéreo (2025) Relatório de Performance ATM do SISCEAB– 2024. São José dos Campos: ICEA/DECEA. In Portuguese. [accessed Aug 16 2025]. https://pesquisa.icea.decea.mil.br/performance_report/2024/
[IBGE] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2022) 2022 Census. [accessed Aug 16 2025]. https://www.ibge.gov.br/en/statistics/social/labor/22836-2022-census-3.html
[ICAO] International Civil Aviation Organization (2023) Annex 16 - Environmental Protection Volume I — Aircraft Noise. Eighth Edition, July 2017. [accessed Aug 16 2025]. https://www.iacm.gov.mz/app/uploads/2018/12/an_16_V1_Environmental-Protection_8ed_2017_rev.-12_01.07.17.pdf
[INFRAERO] Empresa Brasileira de Infraestrutura Aeroportuária (2022). Index of/dadosabertos/Aerodromos/Lista de PZRs Registrados/. In Portuguese. [accessed Aug 16 2025]. https://sistemas.anac.gov.br/dadosabertos/Aerodromos/Lista%20de%20PZRs%20Registrados/
[INFRAERO] Empresa Brasileira de Infraestrutura Aeroportuária (2023) Relatório de avaliação das manifestações da População, da cidade São Paulo, no Formulário de Cadastro de Ruído Aeronáutico da Infraero: Aeroporto de São Paulo/Congonhas - Deputado Freitas Nobre. Ger. de Controle, Consultoria e Planejamento Ambiental – MAPL, Sup. Meio Ambiente – DOMA. In Portuguese.
[PMSP] Prefeitura de São Paulo (2025) Geosampa: Georeferenced Data Platform for the City of São Paulo [accessed 22 Jun 2025]. https://geosampa.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/
Bednarek J (2016) Airports, cities, and the jet age: US Airports Since 1945. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Boucsein B, Christiaanse K, Kasioumi E, Salewski C (2017) The noise landscape: A spatial exploration. Rotterdam: nai010.
Collette JD (2011) Self-reported aircraft noise complaints and socioeconomic demographics in the Greater Philadelphia region: A survey of complaint data from 1997 to 2009. J Aviat Technol Eng 1(1):42-54. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314635
Elliff T, Cremaschi M, Huck V (2020) Impact of aircraft noise pollution on residents of large cities. Brussels: Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament [accessed 22 Jun 2025]. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU(2020)650787
Fidell S, Mestre V (2020) A guide to U.S. Aircraft Noise Regulatory Policy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Fidell S, Mestre V, Sneddon M (2012) A potential role for noise complaints as a predictor of the prevalence of annoyance with aircraft noise. Noise Control Eng J 60(1):62-68. https://doi.org/10.3397/1.3677792
Flores Castillo R, Asensio Rivera C, Gagliardi P, Licitra G (2019) Study of the correction factors for aircraft noise façade measurements. Appl Acoust 145:399-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.10.007
Heleno TA (2010) Uma nova metodologia de zoneamento aeroportuário com o objetivo de reduzir o encroachment e os efeitos adversos do ruído (master’s thesis). Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. In Portuguese. [accessed 22 Jun 2025]. https://w1files.solucaoatrio.net.br/atrio/ufrj-pem_upl/THESIS/85/pemufrj2010msctarcileneaparecidaheleno.pdf
Janic M (2009) Airport analysis, planning and design: Demand, capacity and congestion. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2009.
Kang J (2007) Urban sound environment. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Kasioumi E (2021) Planning the impossible: Urban development and spatial strategies in the Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport region. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Kent JT, Mardia KV (2022) Spatial analysis (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics). Hoboken: Wiley.
Morrell S, Taylor R, Lyle D (1997) A review of health effects of aircraft noise. Aust N Zeal J Public Health 21(2):221-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.1997.tb01690.x
Movable Type Scripts (2025) Calculate distance, bearing and more between Latitude/Longitude points [accessed 27 Jan 2025]. https://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong.html
Oliveira LHW (2024) Los Angeles versus its airports: Exploring monthly noise comment reports to understand trends and geography of noise complaints. Paper presented at IX Iberoamerican Air Transportation Research Society International Congress (RIDITA). p. 251-262. Lisbon: ISEC Lisboa.
Schäffera B, Brinkb M, Schlattera F, Vienneauc D, Wunderlia JM (2020) Residential green is associated with reduced annoyance to road traffic and railway noise but increased annoyance to aircraft noise exposure. Environ Int 143:105885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105885
Schultz TJ (1978) Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. J Acoust Soc Am 64;377-405. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.382013
Southgate D (2007) Aircraft noise – A broad-area issue. In: International Civil Aviation Organization [ICAO]. ICAO Environmental Report 2007. Montreal: ICAO. p. 38-43.
Visser HG, Helby SJ, Wijnen RAA (2008) Management of the environmental impact of airport operations. New York: Nova Science.
Yamagata Y, Seya H (editors) (2020) Spatial analysis using big data: methods and urban applications. London: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-02101-0
Zaporozhets O, Tokarev V, Attenborough K (2011) Aircraft noise: Assessment, prediction and control. New York: Spon Press.
Zografos KG, Andreatta G, van Eenige MJAC, Madas MAA (2013) Decision support system for integrated airport performance assessment and capacity management. In: Zografos KG, Andreatta G, Odoni AR (editors). Modelling and managing airport performance. United Kingdom: Wiley.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Renata Cavion, Michelle Carvalho Galvão da Silva Pinto Bandeira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International — CC BY 4.0. Authors are free to Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially). JATM allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
